The news, 365 days behind — on purpose Delayed live · replaying 2025

One Year Ago.AI

Remember how fast this is.

06MAR2024replayed
one year on
communityOpenAI · Elon Musk

OpenAI releases emails and blog post detailing Elon Musk split in response to Musk's lawsuit

The company responds to Musk's legal action by publishing internal communications that show the billionaire once agreed to a closed-source approach and proposed merging OpenAI with Tesla.

OpenAI this week posted a blog post and a trove of internal emails on its website, directly responding to Elon Musk’s recent lawsuit. The documents, dated years earlier, aim to show that Musk was fully aware of and even endorsed the company’s pivot toward a for-profit structure and closed-source development.

In one of the most cited exchanges, Ilya Sutskever tells Musk that ‘as we get closer to building AI, it will make sense to start being less open,’ to which Musk replies ‘Yup.’ The company says Musk later pushed for merging OpenAI with Tesla or taking full control.

The response has generated intense debate. Many on Hacker News view the release as a calculated PR stunt rather than a good-faith defense. ‘This post is a lame PR stunt,’ wrote one user, arguing that it paints OpenAI as a ‘great benefactor and custodian of virtue’ while selectively using old emails to mock Musk. Another commenter called the release ‘very amateurish almost childish.’

Meanwhile, others see the move as a necessary corrective to Musk’s narrative. ‘They are defending their stance against Elon’s BS,’ one user countered. The dueling comments reflect a broader ambivalence about both parties’ trustworthiness — a sentiment summed up by one reader: ‘A bunch of rich people who are all full of shit pissing on each other.’

T
tcgv

Calls the post a lame PR stunt that selectively uses outdated emails to portray Musk as a sore loser while painting OpenAI as a benevolent custodian.

B
boringg

Finds the selective release of dated emails amateurish and childish, undermining OpenAI's position.

S
shafyy

Dismisses the exchange as rich people full of shit pissing on each other.

R
Reubend

Argues the evidence does not refute Musk's core assertion that OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit, open-source mission for profits.

T
thallavajhula

Defends OpenAI's response as a necessary defense against Musk's hypocrisy and BS.

One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers

The lawsuit and counter-narratives continued to generate headlines, but no court ruling emerged by mid-2026. OpenAI's closed-source pivot remained a central point of criticism from open-source advocates.

Replay thisPost on XRedditHNLinkedIn

The Weekly Replay · free by email

This week, one year ago — every Sunday.

One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.

Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy