one year on
Major record labels sue AI music services Suno and Udio for mass copyright infringement
Sony, UMG Recordings, and Warner, via the RIAA, allege the AI music generators copied copyrighted sound recordings without permission to train models that can generate imitative music, seeking declarations, injunctions, and damages.
The Recording Industry Association of America today filed two copyright infringement lawsuits against AI music generators Suno and Udio, alleging they copied decades of copyrighted sound recordings without permission to train their models. The cases, brought on behalf of Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group, and Warner Records, were filed in federal courts in Boston and New York.
The RIAA says the complaints cover recordings by artists across multiple genres, styles, and eras, and that the services generate outputs that imitate the qualities of genuine human sound recordings. The suits seek declarations of infringement, injunctions, and damages. The complaints argue that the companies engaged in willful infringement on an ‘almost unimaginable scale’ and cannot claim fair use because they generate imitative machine-made music rather than human expression.
The record
RIAA chairman said the music community already partners with responsible AI developers but unlicensed services like Suno and Udio set back the promise of innovative AI by copying artists' work without consent or pay.
RIAA chief legal officer said these are straightforward copyright cases involving unlicensed copying on a massive scale, accusing Suno and Udio of being deliberately evasive about what they copied.
One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers
The Suno and Udio cases have not yet reached trial as of mid-2026, but they prompted a wave of licensing agreements between major labels and other AI music startups. The lawsuits are widely seen as having set the legal framework for how generative audio companies must negotiate with copyright holders.