The news, 365 days behind — on purpose Delayed live · replaying 2025

One Year Ago.AI

Remember how fast this is.

27SEPT2024replayed
one year on
communityBas Dijkstra

I Am Tired of AI

A software testing professional argues the AI hype cycle has produced more heat than light, and a Hacker News thread of 1200+ points suggests he is not alone.

Bas Dijkstra, a test automation professional with 18 years of experience, published a blog post titled “I Am Tired of AI” on September 17, 2024, that has now surged to the top of Hacker News with over 1200 points and 1100+ comments. Dijkstra’s complaint is threefold: as a professional, he sees AI-powered testing tools producing faster but not better results; as a conference program committee member, he automatically rejects proposals clearly written by ChatGPT because they sound dull and identical; and as a human being, he finds AI-generated art, music, and social media posts boring compared to human creations. He acknowledges using AI sparingly but insists it cannot replace skilled human judgment.

The Hacker News thread reflects a deep community split. Animats argues that LLMs have shown their limits—useful but unreliable—and without a confidence metric the industry heads toward another AI winter. Datahack counters that dismissing LLMs echoes early dismissals of the Internet and mobile, and that the exponential improvement curve makes optimism warranted. YeGoblynQueenne points out that LLMs are not new but a direct descendent of Shannon’s 1948 statistical language models, suggesting we are past the early era. The comment section oscillates between these poles, with many agreeing that LLMs are good for narrow, low-stakes tasks but dangerous for anything important.

The post and its reception capture a growing sentiment among technical professionals: the AI hype cycle has produced genuine utility, but also exhaustion and skepticism about whether the industry is building what people actually need.

A
Animats

Argues LLMs have hit a plateau: good at some things, terrible at others, with no confidence metric, risking another AI winter.

D
datahack

Counterargues that dismissing LLMs is like early dismissals of the Internet or mobile; the pace of improvement is exponential and impact may be order of magnitude larger.

Y
YeGoblynQueenne

Points out LLMs are a direct descendant of Shannon's 1948 statistical language models, not a new technology; we are not at the telegraph era but well into the telephone switching era.

M
mhowland

Suggests LLMs are similar to humans in being prone to errors, but argues control systems can mitigate this, calling it a solvable problem.

L
latexr

Counters that humans can be held accountable and provide confidence calibration, whereas LLMs cannot; this makes them waste more time than they save.

One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers

Dijkstra's post is emblematic of a widespread fatigue that has only grown. By mid-2026, the AI industry is still booming, but the skepticism about AI-generated content and overhyped marketing remains a persistent undercurrent. The HN thread's argument about an AI winter or a continued boom is still unresolved.

Replay thisPost on XRedditHNLinkedIn

The Weekly Replay · free by email

This week, one year ago — every Sunday.

One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.

Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy