The news, 365 days behind — on purpose Delayed live · replaying 2025

One Year Ago.AI

Remember how fast this is.

22SEPT2025replayed
one year on
policyGoogle DeepMind

Google DeepMind publishes Frontier Safety Framework update, adding harmful-manipulation and shutdown/control risk coverage.

The third update to the lab’s safety framework adds a critical capability level for ‘harmful manipulation’ and expands coverage to scenarios where models might resist human shutdown or control.

Google DeepMind today is releasing the third iteration of its Frontier Safety Framework, adding a Critical Capability Level for harmful manipulation and expanding its risk assessment to cover misalignment scenarios where models might interfere with operators’ ability to direct, modify or shut down their operations.

The harmful manipulation CCL targets AI systems capable of “systematically and substantially” altering beliefs or behaviors in high-stakes contexts, potentially causing harm at severe scale. The shutdown resistance category addresses risks from models that could interfere with operators’ ability to direct, modify or shut down their operations. DeepMind says it will require safety case reviews before external launches when relevant CCLs are reached, and says large-scale internal deployments can also require review for advanced machine learning research and development CCLs.

The update also refines CCL definitions to trigger governance mechanisms only at the highest threat levels, and describes a more detailed risk assessment process from identification through mitigation. In a blog post, the lab emphasizes that mitigations should apply proactively before systems cross dangerous thresholds.

The third iteration comes 16 months after the framework’s initial release in May 2024. DeepMind says it will continue evolving the framework based on new research, stakeholder input, and implementation lessons.

One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers

Over the following year DeepMind kept widening the framework — adding an early-warning layer of "tracked" capability levels — even as some rivals pared theirs back, and in June 2026 it published a companion "AI Control Roadmap" that treats advanced internal agents as potential insider threats. The shutdown-resistance behavior it began monitoring kept surfacing in independent red-team testing, though the framework, like its peers, remained voluntary and self-enforced.

Filed

Compiled and edited by .

Replay thisPost on XRedditHNLinkedIn

The Weekly Replay · free by email

This week, one year ago — every Sunday.

One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.

Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy