The news, 365 days behind — on purpose Delayed live · replaying 2025

One Year Ago.AI

Remember how fast this is.

05SEPT2025replayed
one year on
policyAnthropic · Andrea Bartz · Charles Graeber · Kirk Wallace Johnson · Justin Nelson · Aparna Sridhar

Anthropic agrees to $1.5 billion settlement with authors in landmark AI copyright case

The deal, which would pay roughly $3,000 per book for about 500,000 works, has been called the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history and may set a benchmark for how AI companies compensate creators for training data.

Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class-action copyright lawsuit brought by authors who accused the AI company of using pirated copies of their books to train its Claude language model. The proposed settlement, which requires court approval, would distribute roughly $3,000 per work across an estimated 500,000 books; the motion seeking approval calls it the “largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history.”

The case, Bartz v. Anthropic, was set to go to trial in December. In July, U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that training AI on lawfully acquired books qualifies as fair use, but he allowed the case to proceed on the narrower claim that Anthropic had downloaded books from shadow libraries such as Library Genesis. That distinction exposed the company to potentially ruinous statutory damages — some estimates ran as high as $1 trillion if willful infringement were found.

Anthropic, which this week announced a $13 billion fundraising round at a $183 billion valuation, said it felt ‘inordinate pressure’ to settle. The company will also destroy the pirated files it was accused of amassing. Legal experts said the deal does not set a binding precedent, but it provides a reference point for similar cases pending against OpenAI, Meta, and others — and, some argued, a nudge toward a licensed, market-based model for training data.

J
Justin Nelson

Co-lead plaintiffs' counsel said the settlement "far surpasses any other known copyright recovery" and said it "sends a powerful message to AI companies and creators alike that taking copyrighted works from these pirate websites is wrong."

A
Aparna Sridhar

Deputy general counsel at Anthropic, stated that the settlement 'will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims' following the June ruling on fair use.

J
James Grimmelmann

The Cornell law professor said the deal "doesn't try to resolve all of the copyright issues around generative AI," reading it as narrowly about the piracy.

C
Cecilia Ziniti

The lawyer and GC AI founder called the settlement the start of "a necessary evolution toward a legitimate, market-based licensing scheme."

One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers

Judge Alsup gave the deal preliminary approval on September 25, 2025 after first airing doubts about it; he retired at year's end, and Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín granted final approval in July 2026 — roughly $3,000 for each of about 500,000 works — while trimming the plaintiffs' lawyers' fee from the $187.5 million sought to about $101.6 million. It stood as the largest payout in U.S. copyright history, but it turned on Anthropic's piracy, not on AI training itself; whether training on copyrighted work is fair use stayed unsettled and in litigation.

Filed

Compiled and edited by .

Replay thisPost on XRedditHNLinkedIn

The Weekly Replay · free by email

This week, one year ago — every Sunday.

One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.

Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy